I was working on this project where speed metrics are very important. On one of the pages, a couple of YouTube videos were added, but these really killed the PageSpeed score. We had to do something about it, and this is what I will explain in this article.
Lazy loading the iframe
loading="lazy" is slowly becoming a possible solution to avoid loading the iframe if it's not displayed. I'm not sure why it's not added by default in the embed markup, but I see no reason not to do it.
<iframe width="560" height="315" loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ogfYd705cRs" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen> </iframe>
Loading less scripts
Digging deeper, I found this article about lazy load embedded YouTube videos. It shows a really neat solution where you use the
srcdoc doc property of the iframe in order to replace the video player with a thumbnail and a link.
This solution is really nice because it doesn't require any additional tooling, you simply have to write a bit more of html.
Sounds perfect? Almost. It has one slight issue: on mobile, you need to tap twice to play the video. When reading the comments, I learned about another possible solution...
lite-youtube custom element
What does this custom element provides?
Provide videos with a supercharged focus on visual performance. This custom element renders just like the real thing but approximately 224× faster.
Sounds like a deal. But maybe you don't want to/cannot add easily these files to your project. Or you simply want to test it. This is why I created a really simple service (hosted on Vercel) that is powered by this custom element. Simply replace your regular YouTube embed by this.
<div class="iframe-container"> <iframe src="https://lite-youtube-embed-iframe.vercel.app/embed/ogfYd705cRs?controls=0" loading="lazy"></iframe> </div>
I'm not sure if it's really better than the solution from css-tricks, but using this custom element has some nice side effects, like using youtube-nocookies by default. I just wanted to experiment to see if this could be a viable solution.
So what do you think? Is this better than adding the custom element to your project?